The IT industry is no different. Software as a Service (SaaS) is a subscription-based purchasing model that software publishers and their clients have really embraced in recent years.
Now, instead of spending one, large sum to outright purchase the discs for an application, businesses can pay a smaller, steady payment to access it from the publisher.
Like anything else, SaaS has its advantages and disadvantages. The good news for businesses is that it can make software costs easier to plan for. The bad news is that it comes with some pretty strict contract terms and steep consequences for noncompliance.
Let’s take a closer look at some of the pros and cons of using the as a service model for software licensing.
For businesses, subscription-based software licensing make it simpler to understand and allocate costs for separate business units or departments. Plus, it can be easier to account for a steady expenditure rather than one, large cost every few years.
Publishers using the as a service model may also have multiple tiers of pricing, allowing businesses to pay less in exchange for access to fewer features of the application. This has created a lower buying threshold, giving smaller businesses access to software they might otherwise have been unable to afford.
Perhaps the best benefit of SaaS is the automatic access to patches and updates.
With perpetual software licensing, businesses used one iteration of an application until it absolutely had to be updated to the latest version — either for security reasons or to access new features.
A subscription-based model means the publisher will automatically update your licenses as new versions are released. Your employees won’t be using outdated tools and the business doesn’t have to spring for a whole new application.
Today’s employees are looking for flexibility in their working lives — and workplace mobility plays a big part in that. As a result, businesses are embracing remote working policies.
This trend means that the software your employees depend on needs to be accessible from anywhere — it’s another reason SaaS is gaining in popularity. With no disc to be installed, SaaS-based applications can be used anywhere there’s a network connection. It’s helping the mobile workplace become more attainable.
Publishers aren’t responsible for ensuring data security when using the SaaS model for their applications. Instead, it’s the business’s responsibility to make sure there are appropriate security safeguards and protocols in place.
The growing popularity of mobility in the workplace has created a somewhat unique challenge for IT departments as they struggle to secure mobile devices in remote locations. Endpoint security is now vital in order to safeguard important data in an increasingly mobile world.
The rise of SaaS has contributed to the need for strong endpoint security. Employees will want — and need — to take workplace software applications on the go. And businesses need to accommodate this trend without opening themselves to malicious attacks.
Compliance is a huge concern for businesses partaking in SaaS offerings. SaaS contracts can be difficult to understand and the penalties for overusing licenses are often steep. Companies found to be out of compliance by the publisher may end up having to pay a large, lump sum in order to get up to date quickly.
This means that Software Asset Management (SAM) has become an important part of the IT department’s job. The company needs to know how many licenses each business unit or department is using — as well as how many the business is entitled to — in order to avoid over- and under-usage.
With the perpetual software sales model, applications were largely controlled by the business that used them.
The SaaS model turns much of that control over to the publisher.
Now, that can be a good thing. For instance, instead of having to gauge when to upgrade to the latest version of an application and going through the process of installing that new version, the publisher rolls out automatic updates.
However, it also means publishers keep a close eye on their clients’ usage. And they won’t hesitate to audit a company they suspect is out of compliance with its contract. The resulting process is largely controlled by the publisher and, if not prepared for it, businesses can find themselves struggling to navigate it.
Consider having a knowledgeable third party available to help your organization get through the software audit with the least amount of financial repercussions.
The short answer is yes — if you’re properly managing your software licensing.
This is where SAM comes in. In the past, with perpetual licensing, this wasn’t really a necessity for businesses. But the proliferation of SaaS has made it a vital job for the IT department.
At its core, SAM is the process of finding out how many licenses you’re using and comparing that to the amount you’re entitled to. It’s how your business ensures its compliance and avoids publisher audits. In the age of SaaS, it’s essential.
But SAM can do so much more. With proper processes in place, businesses can see more than just what’s being used. Companies can get a better idea of which employees are using which applications, how much they’re using them and if they’re actually using all the features of the application. This information empowers the business to make more informed decisions on both current and future software investments.